Comment

Comment by todd slingerland on August 7, 2012 at 3:35pm

no need to apologize the thing is that getting response's at that time my questions that relate to that battle or my odds of winning the lottery not once but 20 or more times are the odds of broadcasting infer.

Comment by Ann M Dow on August 7, 2012 at 3:20pm

well frankly in today's world, nothing seems out of the realm of possibilty in broadcasting given cable and the freedoms there and also there are wavelengths of sound from all over the world...if the theory that once a sound is generated it simply continues to exist in space is true, then there is no limit to what one could conceivably record in that regard...i again, apologize for my ignorance concerning the process and did not mean any offense in my comments- truly this is the first time i've encountered firsthand this method ...guess i've got lots to learn...peace for your day!

Comment by todd slingerland on August 7, 2012 at 3:04pm

because every response is directly after a question i asked that relates to what happen in those spots mind you i have it in rev and scans 1 mill second a station. to get 3 four words of the same voice over many stations that answer your question. plus why would radios stations have kill me and cannon ball and words all having to do for what happen there.

Comment by Ann M Dow on August 7, 2012 at 2:47pm

ok i watched , and mind you ,i've never seen this done before- how do you know which background noises are the correct ones to listen to for your answers? there is an amazing amount of noise , and forgive my ignorance- how do you decide which is the answer given the other random sound pollution?...very interesting...